Section I. Theology
Secularization as a Subject of Theological Research
Article reference:
Yakovleva V. Sekulyarizatsiya kak predmet teologicheskikh issledovaniy [Secularization as a subject of theological research] // Trudy Saratovskoj Pravoslavnoj Duhovnoj Seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 13–29. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_13
Abstract
This article examines the evolution of understanding of the phenomenon of "secularization" within the framework of theological discourse. The study of the issue includes a variety of opinions of various experts, starting with the use of it by Henry II of Orleans in the context of the rejection of part of church property, and ending with the analysis of the positions of Western and domestic researchers such as Charles Taylor and John Milbank, A.V. Danilov and D.K. Beznyuk. The above-mentioned scientists propose polar directions to understanding secularization in modern society. The difference in approaches to the consideration of this phenomenon indicates the depth of the problem and the need to systematize all approaches to its understanding in a single field, which is what the article suggests. In conclusion, it is summed up that it is necessary to attract specialists in the field of theology to study the phenomenon of secularization.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Bella R. (1972) "Sotsiologiya religii" [Sociology of Religion]. In: "Amerikanskaya sotsiologiya: perspektivy, problemy, metody" [American Sociology: Prospects, Problems, Methods]. Moscow. pp. 265–281. (In Russian. Trans. from English).
2. Bella R. (2014) "Grazhdanskaya religiya v Amerike" [Civil Religion in America]. In: "Vestnik Russkoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii" [Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy]. Vol. 15. Iss. 3. pp. 162–182. (In Russian. Trans. from English).
3. Berger P.L. (2009) The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. N.Y. (In English).
4. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. N.Y. (In English).
5. Beznyuk D.K. (2009) "Sekulyarizatsiya: opyt sistematizatsii podkhodov izucheniya" [Secularization: An Experience of Systematizing Study Approaches]. In: "Sotsiologiya" [Sociology]. No. 3. pp. 98–104. (In Russian).
6. Casanova J. (1994) Public religions in the modern world. Chicago; London. (In English).
7. Danilov A.V. (2003) "Dialektika sekulyarizatsii i yeye problemy" [The Dialectics of Secularization and Its Problems]. In: "VIII Mezhdunarodnyye Kirillo-Mefodiyevskiye chteniya, posvyashchennyye Dnyam slavyanskoy pis'mennosti i kul'tury: materialy chteniy (Minsk, 23–26 maya 2002 g.)" [VIII International Cyril and Methodius Readings, dedicated to the Days of Slavic Literature and Culture: readings materials (Minsk, May 23–26, 2002)]. In 2 parts. Part 1. Book 1. Minsk. Available at: https://yandexwebcache.net/yandbtm?fmode=inject&tm=1750233824&tld=ru&lang=ru&la= 1749573504&text=Данилов+А.В.+Диалектика+секуляризации+и+ее+проблемы+//+VIII+ Международные+Кирилло-Мефодиевские+чтения%2C+ посвященные+Дням+славянской+письменности+ и+культуры%3A+материалы+чтений+%28Минск%2C+23–26+мая+2002+г.%29.&url=https%3A //sobor.by/danilov.php&l10n=ru&mime=html&sign=cb174e85ca5fcf9a88705a68585d9cc5&keyno=0 (18/06/2025). (In Russian).
8. Davydov O. (2015) "Via premoderna: metafiziko-politicheskiy proyekt Dzhona Milbanka" [Via premoderna: John Milbank's metaphysical and political project]. In: "Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom" [State, religion, church in Russia and Worldwide]. No. 3 (33). pp. 361–381. (In Russian).
9. Kuleshev M.S. (2009) "Ponyatiye sekulyarizatsii v zapadnoy i russkoy sotsiologii religii" [The concept of secularization in Western and Russian sociology of religion]. In: "Yezhegodnaya bogoslovskaya konferentsiya Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta" [Annual theological conference of the Orthodox St. Tikhon's University for the Humanities]. No. 19–2. pp. 81–85. (In Russian).
10. Luckmann T. (1967) The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. N.Y. (In English).
11. Lutsenko A.V. (2021) "Teoriya sekulyarizatsii v kontekste problematiki sovremennoy filosofii religii" [The theory of secularization in the context of the problems of modern philosophy of religion]. In: "Sotsiologiya" [Sociology]. No. 3. pp. 188–193. (In Russian).
12. Milbank D. (2023) "Po tu storonu sekulyarnogo poryadka: reprezentatsiya bytiya i reprezentatsiya naroda" [Beyond the Secular Order: Representation of Being and Representation of the People]. Moscow. (In Russian. Trans. from English).
13. Parsons T. (1998) "Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv" [The System of Modern Societies]. Moscow. (In Russian. Trans. from English).
14. Pavlov I. (2019) "Dialektika sekulyarizatsii v Rossii: k otsenke «Istorii russkoy filosofii» Vasiliya Zen'kovskogo" [The Dialectics of Secularization in Russia: Towards an Assessment of Vasily Zenkovsky's "History of Russian Philosophy"]. In: "Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom" [State, Religion, Church in Russia and Worldwide]. No. 3. pp. 253–276. (In Russian).
15. Romanova E.G. (2014) "K voprosu o soderzhanii printsipa svobody sovesti v Soyedinennykh shtatakh Ameriki" [On the Content of the Principle of Freedom of Conscience in the United States of America]. In: "Vestnik Russkoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii" [Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy]. Vol. 15. Iss. 3. pp. 151–161. (In Russian).
16. Rutkevich E.D. "Sekulyarizatsiya" [Secularization]. In: "Bol'shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya" [The Great Russian Encyclopedia]. Available at: https://bigenc.ru/c/sekuliarizatsiia-494cbb (04/01/2024). (In Russian).
17. Shiner L. (1967) The Concept of Secularization in Empirical Research. In: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. Vol. 6. No. 2. pp. 207–220. (In English).
18. Taylor C. (2017) "Sekulyarnyy vek" [The Secular Age]. Moscow. (In Russian. Trans. from English).
19. Uzlaner D.A. (2019) "Konets religii? Istoriya teorii sekulyarizatsii" [The End of Religion? History of the Theory of Secularization]. Moscow. (In Russian).
Author information
Valeria Yakovleva
Position: postgraduate student, Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute for Post-Graduate Studies
Address: 4/2 Pyatnitskaya str., bld. 1, Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation
Email: ya.valeria2001@gmail.com
ORCID: 0009-0001-3303-558X
Religious Experience of the Special Military Operation Participants in the Pastoral Practice of Military Clergy
Article reference:
Sukhanov G. Religioznyy opyt uchastnikov spetsial'noy voyennoy operatsii v pastyrskoy praktike voyennogo dukhovenstva [Religious experience of the Special military operation participants in the pastoral practice of military clergy] // Trudy Saratovskoj Pravoslavnoj Duhovnoj Seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 30–55. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_30
Abstract
The main purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the religious experiences of soldiers in the special military operation. To achieve this goal, a detailed description of the phenomenon of religious experience in the Christian (Orthodox) tradition is given. The phenomenon of war is considered from the point of view of the official position of the Russian Orthodox Church, and the views of modern Russian theologians and philosophers are also presented. The study provides numerous examples of soldiers' religious experiences: participation in the sacraments, prayer, observance of military ethics and the fight against sin. The cases of awakening the religious feelings of soldiers in war in extreme conditions are of the greatest value. Finally, the thesis is put forward about the need for spiritual and moral unity of the entire people to overcome the disease of war.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Chernykh P.Ya. (1999) "Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka" [Historical and Etymological Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language]. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. "A — Pantomima" [A — Pantomime]. Moscow. (In Russian).
2. Igumnov P.P. (2002) "Blagochestiye" [Piety]. In: "Pravoslavnaya Entsiklopediya" [Orthodox Encyclopedia]. Vol. 5. Moscow. pp. 334–337. Available at: https://www.pravenc.ru/text/149337.html?ysclid=m6879uhmlm388440089 (06/07/2024). (In Russian).
3. Korobov-Latyntsev A.Yu. (2020) "Filosofiya na linii fronta" [Philosophy on the Front Line]. In: "Materialy sektsiy «Filosofiya na linii fronta», provedennoy v ramkakh «Donetskikh chteniy 2018»" [Materials of the sections "Philosophy on the Front Line", held within the framework of "Donetsk Readings 2018"]. Moscow. pp. 84–87. (In Russian).
4. Kossovich K.A. (2016) "Sanskrito-russkiy slovar'" [Sanskrit-Russian Dictionary]. Moscow. Available at: https://samskrtam.ru/sanskritlexicon/kossowich/?ysclid=m99n1lgnov966027899 (08/04/2025). (In Russian).
5. Kurenkov A. (2023) "Kontseptsiya spravedlivoy voyny v Drevnem mire" [The Concept of Just War in the Ancient World]. In: "Trudy Belgorodskoy Pravoslavnoy Dukhovnoy seminarii" [Works of the Belgorod Orthodox Theological Seminary]. No. 16. pp. 10–19. (In Russian).
6. Muza D.E. (2020) "Ukraina i Donbass kak arena tsivilizatsionnogeopoliticheskoy konfliktnosti Rossii i Zapada (istoriya i sovremennost')" [Ukraine and Donbass as an arena of civilizational and geopolitical conflict between Russia and the West (history and modernity)]. In: "Materialy sektsiy «Filosofiya na linii fronta», provedennoy v ramkakh «Donetskikh chteniy 2018»" [Materials of the sections "Philosophy on the Front Line", held within the framework of "Donetsk Readings 2018"]. Moscow. pp. 87–93. (In Russian).
7. Sukhanov G.O. (2024) "Pravoslavnoye osmysleniye voyny na osnove Svyashchennogo Pisaniya i svyatootecheskogo naslediya" [Orthodox understanding of war based on the Holy Scripture and patristic heritage]. In: "Bogoslovskiy vestnik" [Theological Bulletin]. No. 3 (54). pp. 340–370. (In Russian).
8. Trukhan A.V. (2020) "Ideokraticheskoye protivostoyaniye Rossii i Yevropy: k opredeleniyu ponyatiya russkogo ideokraticheskogo soznaniya" [Ideocratic confrontation between Russia and Europe: towards defining the concept of Russian ideocratic consciousness]. In: "Materialy sektsiy «Filosofiya na linii fronta», provedennoy v ramkakh «Donetskikh chteniy 2018»" [Materials of the sections "Philosophy on the Front Line", held within the framework of "Donetsk Readings 2018"]. Moscow. pp. 184–191. (In Russian).
Author information
George Sukhanov
Position: postgraduate student, Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute of Post-Graduate Studies
Address: 4/2 Pyatnitskaya str., bld. 5, Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation
Email: suxanov.georgij@bk.ru
Section II. Philosophy
Analysis of the Problems of Transhumanism on the Example of the Concept of Digital Immortality
Article reference:
Galkin I., priest. Analiz problem transgumanizma na primere koncepcii cifrovogo bessmertiya [Analysis of the problems of transhumanism on the example of the concept of digital immortality] // Trudy Saratovskoj Pravoslavnoj Duhovnoj Seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 56–79. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_56
Abstract
Transhumanism is a philosophical and cultural movement whose paradigm is based on the idea of a radical transformation of human nature through technology. Its followers see scientific and technological progress as a tool to overcome biological limitations: aging, disease, death, as well as to expand physical and cognitive capabilities. Transhumanism sees death as a problem that needs to be solved, and digital immortality as one of the possible solutions. Digital immortality is the concept of preserving the consciousness of a person in digital form, which opens the way to "life after death" in a virtual environment. This concept not only reflects the desire for immortality, but also becomes a logical continuation of transhumanist principles such as human betterment, overcoming death and the radical expansion of the possibilities of the mind. This article examines the main provisions of transhumanism through the conceptual and theologically applied prism of digital immortality, followed by a philosophical analysis of the central components of its paradigm.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Bamford S. A framework for approaches to transfer of a mind's substrate. Available at: https://sim.me.uk/neural/JournalArticles/Bamford2012IJMC.pdf (06/11/2024). (In English).
2. Baryshnikov P.N. (2014) "Tipologiya bessmertiya v teoreticheskom pole frantsuzskogo transgumanizma" [Typology of immortality in the theoretical field of French transhumanism]. In: "Filosofskiye problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy i kiberprostranstva" [Philosophical problems of information technology and cyberspace]. No. 1 (7). pp. 98–127. (In Russian).
3. Bril' E.V., Shaderkina A.I., Efimochkina S.M. (2024) "Invazivnyye neyrointerfeysy — oblasti primeneniya" [Invasive neurointerfaces – areas of application]. In: "Rossiyskiy zhurnal telemeditsiny i elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya" [Russian Journal of Telemedicine and Electronic Health]. Vol. 10. No. 2. pp. 27–42. (In Russian).
4. Buin N.A., Starostina M.K. (2019) "Kontsept «tsifrovoye bessmertiye» v sovremennoy teorii" [The concept of "digital immortality" in modern theory]. In: "Kul'tura: teoriya i praktika" [Culture: Theory and Practice]. No. 6 (33). Available at: http://theoryofculture.ru/issues/111/1313/ (12/06/2025). (In Russian).
5. Chalmers D. (2015) "Soznayushchiy um: v poiskakh fundamental'noy teorii" [The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory]. Moscow. (In Russian. Translated from English).
6. Cherdantseva I.V., Kuzub O.S., Zhirenova A.T. (2020) "Problema tsifrovogo bessmertiya" [The Problem of Digital Immortality]. In: "Filosofskiye deskripty" [Philosophical Descriptives]. № 21. Available at: https://philosophdescript.ru/?q=node/177 (12/06/2025). (In Russian).
7. Doidge N. (2018) "Plastichnost' mozga: potryasayushchiye fakty o tom, kak mysli sposobny menyat' strukturu i funktsii nashego mozga" [Brain plasticity: amazing facts about how thoughts can change the structure and functions of our brain]. Moscow. (In Russian).
8. Epstein R. The empty brain. Available at: https://aeon.co/essays/your-brain-does-not-process-information-and-it-is-not-a-computer (06/11/2024). (In English).
9. Gaspar-Silva F., Trigo D. Magalhaes J. (2023) Ageing in the brain: mechanisms and rejuvenating strategies. № 80, 190. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00018-023-04832-6 (06/11/2024) (In English).
10. Hughes J. Transhumanism and Personal Identity. Available at: https://philpapers.org/archive/HUGTAP-7.pdf (06/03/2024). (In English).
11. Kopylov S.A. (2020) "Tsifrovoye bessmertiye" [Digital Immortality]. In: "Obshchestvo i kul'tura: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy. Materialy V Vserossiyskoy studencheskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Novosibirsk. 19 maya 2020 goda" [Society and Culture: Problems, Trends, Prospects. Proceedings of the V All-Russian Student Scientific and Practical Conference, Novosibirsk. May 19, 2020]. Novosibirsk. pp. 164–168. (In Russian).
12. Lamprini К. Social Exclusion of Elderly. Available at: https://www.primescholars.com/articles/social-exclusion-of-elderly-96205.html (06/11/2024). (In English).
13. Locke D. (1985) "Sochineniya v trekh tomakh" [Works in Three Volumes]. Vol. 1. Moscow. (In Russian).
14. Minkova N.V. (2010) "Ambivalentnost' otnosheniya k smerti vo Vtoroye Srednevekov'ye i v massovoy kul'ture postmoderna" [Ambivalence of Attitudes to Death in the Second Middle Ages and in Postmodern Mass Culture]. In: "Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye" [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. No. 1. pp. 209–213. (In Russian).
15. Nazarova Yu.V. (2021) "Etika poslesmertiya v usloviyakh tsifrovoy real'nosti" [Ethics of the Afterlife in the Context of Digital Reality]. In: "Gumanitarnyye vedomosti TGPU im. L.N. Tolstogo" [Humanitarian Gazette of the Tolstoy State Pedagogical University]. No. 2 (38). pp. 31–38. (In Russian).
16. Nazarova Yu.V. (2024) "Aksiologiya tsifrovogo bessmertiya" [Axiology of Digital Immortality]. In: "NOMOTHETIKA: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo" [NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law]. No. 4. pp. 792–799. (In Russian).
17. Nerush A.A., Nerush T.G. (2020) "Tsifrovaya smert' i tsifrovoye bessmertiye v kontekste nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo progressa" [Digital Death and Digital Immortality in the Context of Scientific and Technological Progress]. In: "Psikhologo-ekonomicheskiye issledovaniya" [Psychological and Economic Research]. Vol. 7. No. 4. pp. 117–125. (In Russian).
18. Ostanin A.R. (2020) "Iskustvennyy intellekt i neyronauka" [Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience]. In: "Razrabotka i primeneniye naukoyomkikh tekhnologiy v tselyakh modernizatsii sovremennogo obshchestva: sbornik statey Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Kirov, 29 yanvarya 2020 goda" [Development and Application of High-Tech Technologies for the Modernization of Modern Society: Collection of Articles from the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Kirov, January 29, 2020]. Kirov. pp. 125–129. (In Russian).
19. Pietroforte M. Mind uploading and consciousness Why an uploaded mind will be unconscious. Available at: https://hplus.club/blog/mind-uploading-and-consciousness-why-an-uploaded-mind-will-beunconscious/ (06/11/2024). (In English).
20. Podsmashny D.E., Safonova N.V. (2018) "Tsifrovoye bessmertiye: komu eto nuzhno?" [Digital Immortality: Who Needs It?]. In: "Forum molodykh uchenykh" [Forum of Young Scientists]. No. 6–2(22). pp. 1181–1185. (In Russian).
21. Skolota Z.N., Alekseeva I.Yu. (2016) "Fenomen bessmertiya v virtual'nom mire" [The Phenomenon of Immortality in the Virtual World]. In: "Kaspiyskiy region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura" [Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture]. No. 3 (48). pp. 135–141. (In Russian).
22. Solovieva L.N. (2022) "Modusy tsifrovogo bytiya cheloveka informatsionnoy epokhi" [Modes of Digital Being of a Person in the Information Age]. In: "Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura" [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture]. No. 4 (96). pp. 51–55. (In Russian).
23. Tegmark M. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://aitskadapa.ac.in/e-books/CSE/AI/Life%203.0_%20Being%20Human%20in %20 the%20Age%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20 (%20PDFDrive%20).pdf (06/11/2024). (In English).
24. Turing A.M. (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. In: Mind. Vol. LIX. Iss. 236. pp. 433–460. (In English). DOI: 10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
25. Vance J. Becoming Immortal: The Future of Brain Augmentation and Uploaded Consciousness. Available at: https://futurism.com/becoming-immortal-the-future-of-brain-augmentation-anduploaded-consciousness (06/11/2024). (In English).
26. Yatsevich M.Yu., Belonogov M.A. (2025) "Filosofsko-eticheskiye problemy tsifrovogo bessmertiya" [Philosophical and ethical problems of digital immortality]. In: "Universum: obshchestvennyye nauki" [Universum: social sciences]. № 12 (115). pp. 61–63. (In Russian).
27. Кurzweil R. The singularity is nearer. Available at: https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/ray-kurzweil/the-singularity-isnearer/ (06/03/2024). (In English).
Author information
Priest Ivan Galkin
Position: Master's student, Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary
Address: 92 Michurina St., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation
Email: panamar.ru@yandex.ru
Privatization of Religion: Between T. Luckmann and J. Casanova
Article reference:
Markin K. Privatizatsiya religii: mezhdu T. Lukmanom i KH. Kazanovoy [Privatization of religion: between T. Luckmann and J. Casanova] // Trudy Saratovskoj Pravoslavnoj Duhovnoj Seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 80–106. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_80
Abstract
The article discusses the complexity and relevance of the concept of privatization, which is formulated in different theoretical languages, forming different types. Comparing the deprivatization of J. Casanova and the privatization of T. Luckmann, two types can be distinguished: 1) privatization-marginalization — that is, privatization with a clearly expressed political connotation external to religion, which, as Casanova believes, is based on the positivist theory of the staged development of society as a universal, "natural", progressive movement from religious to secular (modern) consciousness; 2) privatization-deinstitutionalization — trying to trace the internal transformation of religion in the differentiated social spheres, Luckmann excludes religion not from the public sphere, but from the generally accepted understanding of religion as a Church institution. Luckmann's theoretical language provides us with sufficient tools to describe how churches can maintain their public visibility, actualizing the lives of believers who belong to them. Casanova, who writes about deprivatization, has in mind the phenomenon that is the opposite of privatization-marginalization, while Luckmann writes primarily about privatization-deinstitutionalization. Privatization in Luckmann's sense and deprivatization in Casanova's are not contradictory, but rather are parts of a general process of transformation of religion in the contemporary world.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Arendt H. (2000) "Vita Activa, ili O deyatel'noy zhizni" [Vita Activa, or On the Active Life]. St. Petersburg. (In Russian. Trans. from German and English).
2. Asad T. (2020) "Vozniknoveniye sekulyarnogo: khristianstvo, islam, modernost'" [The Emergence of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity]. Moscow. (In Russian).
3. Berger P. (2012) "Fal'sifitsirovannaya sekulyarizatsiya" [Falsified Secularization]. In: "Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom" [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. No. 2 (30). pp. 8–20. (In Russian).
4. Berger P. (2019) "Svyashchennaya zavesa. Elementy sotsiologicheskoy teorii religii" [The Sacred Veil. Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion]. Moscow. (In Russian).
5. Berger P., Luckmann T. (1995) "Sotsial'noye konstruirovaniye real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya" [The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow. (In Russian).
6. Besecke K. (2005) Seeing invisible religion: Religion as a societal conversationabouttranscendentmeaning. In: Sociological Theory. Vol. 2. № 2. pp. 179–196. (In English).
7. Borovik I. (2020) "Chastnaya religiya i publichnaya religiya. Diskussii vokrug kontseptsii Khose Kazanovy" [Private Religion and Public Religion. Discussions around the Concept of Jose Casanova]. In: "Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina" [Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin]. No. 3. pp. 167–184. (In Russian).
8. Casanova H. (2018) "Razmyshlyaya o postsekulyarnom: tri znacheniya «sekulyarnogo» i tri vozmozhnosti vykhoda za yego predely" [Reflecting on the Post-Secular: Three Meanings of "Secular" and Three Possibilities of Going Beyond It]. In: "Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom" [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. Vol. 36. No. 4. pp. 143–174. (In Russian).
9. Casanova J. (1984) The politics of the religious revival. In: Telos. № 59. pp. 3–33. (In English).
10. Casanova J. (1992) Private and Public Religions. In: Sociological Research. № 1. pp. 17–57. (In English).
11. Casanova J. (1994) Public religions in the modern world. Chicago; London. (In English).
12. Casanova J. (2008) Public religions revisited. pp. 101–119. Available at: https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/publications/publicreligions-revisited (25/03/2025). (In English).
13. DeCew J.W. (2015) The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings. In: Social Dimensions of Privacy. Vol. 1. Cambridge. pp. 85–103. (In English).
14. Dmitriev T. (2022) "Obshchiye istoki, raznyye itogi: Maks Veber i Ernst Trol'ch ob obshchestvenno-politicheskikh posledstviyakh protestantskoy reformatsii" [Common Origins, Different Results: Max Weber and Ernst Troeltsch on the Socio-Political Consequences of the Protestant Reformation]. In: "Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye" [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 21. No. 2. pp. 149–188. (In Russian).
15. Douglas A. (1998) The feminization of American culture. Macmillan. (In English).
16. Fitzgerald T. (2007) Discourse on civility and barbarity: a critical history of religion and related categories. New York. (In English).
17. Habermas Yu. (2017) "Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoj sfery" [Structural change of the public sphere]. Moscow. (In Russian. Trans. from German).
18. Inglehart R.F. (2021) Religion's Sudden Decline: What's Causing it, and What Comes Next? Vol. 1. New York. (In English).
19. Kasselstrand I., Zuckerman P., Cragun R.T. (2023) Beyond doubt: the secularization of society. New York. (In English).
20. Knoblauch H. (1998) Transzendenzerfahrung und symbolische Kommunikation: die phänomenologisch orientierte Soziologie und die kommunikative Konstruktion der Religion [Experience of transcendence and symbolic communication: phenomenologically oriented sociology and the communicative construction of religion]. In: Religion als Kommunikation Religion in der Gesellschaft [Religion as communication Religion in society]. Würzburg. pp. 147–186. (In German).
21. Luckmann T. (1967) The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York. (In English).
22. Luckmann T. (1979) The structural conditions of religious consciousness in modern societies. In: Japanese Journal of religious studies. №6. pp. 121–137. (In English).
23. Luckmann T. (1990) Shrinking transcendence, expanding religion? In: Sociological analysis. Vol. 51. № 2. pp. 127–138. (In English).
24. Luckmann T. (2003) Transformations of religion and morality in modern Europe. In: Social compass. 2003. Vol. 50. № 3. pp. 275–285. (In English).
25. Luckmann T., Kostrova E., Zabaev I. (2014) "Dopolneniye k tret'yemu nemetskomu izdaniyu «Nevidimoy religii»" [Supplement to the third German edition of "Invisible Religion"]. In: "Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye" [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 13. No. 1. pp. 139–154. (In Russian).
26. Luhmann N. (1977) Funktion der Religion [Function of religion]. Frankfurt am Main. (In German).
27. Markin K. (2023) "Rekonstruktsiya trekh tipov transtsendentsiy v sotsiologii religii Tomasa Lukmana" [Reconstruction of Three Types of Transcendences in Thomas Luckmann's Sociology of Religion]. In: "Logos" [Logos]. Vol. 33. No. 6 (157). pp. 111–142. (In Russian).
28. Mazurkiewicz P.A., Mazurkiewicz P. (2003) Kościół katolicki w przededniu wejścia Polski do Unii Europejskiej [The Catholic Church on the Eve of Poland's Accession to the European Union]. Warszawa. (In Polish).
29. Parsons T. (1966) 1965 Harlan Paul Douglass Lectures: Religion in a Modern Pluralistic Society. In: Review of Religious Research. Vol. 7. № 3. pp. 125–146. (In English).
30. Ramstedt O., Filippov A. (2020) "Aktual'nost' sotsiologii Zimmelya" [The Relevance of Zimmel's Sociology]. In: "Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye" [Russian Sociological Review]. Vol. 19. No. 2. pp. 348–367. (In Russian).
31. Schluchter W. (1989) Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Berkeley. (In English).
32. Troeltsch E. (1998) Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen und Gruppen [The social teachings of Christian churches and groups]. Vol. I. Tübingen. (In German).
33. Troeltsch E. (2017) Protestantism and Progress: A Historical Study of the Relation of Protestantism to the Modern World. London. (In English).
34. Uzlaner D.A. (2012) "Ot sekulyarnoy sovremennosti k «mnozhestvennym»: sotsial'naya teoriya o sootnoshenii religii i sovremennosti" [From Secular Modernity to "Multiple": Social Theory on the Relationship between Religion and Modernity]. In: "Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom" [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. No. 1 (30). pp. 11–58. (In Russian).
35. Varacalli J.A. (1995) Public Religions in the Modern World By José Casanova. In: The Catholic Historical Review. Vol. 81. № 3. pp. 407–408. (In English).
36. Weintraub J. et al. (1997) The theory and politics of the public / private distinction. In: Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy. Vol. 1. № 7. Chicago; London. pp. 1–42. (In English).
37. Zarzycka B., Stiftung B. (2008) Tradition or Charisma? Religiosity in Poland. In: What the world believes: Analysis and commentary on the Religion Monitor 2008. Gütersloh. pp. 201–222. (In English).
38. Zimmel G. (1996) "Izbrannoye. Tom 2. Sozertsaniye zhizni" [Selected Works. Vol. 2. Contemplation of Life]. Moscow. (In Russian).
Author information
Kirill Markin
Position: Researcher, "Sociology of Religion" research laboratory, St. Tikhon's Orthodox University for the Humanities
Address: 6, Likhov per., bldg. 1, office 417, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation
Email: markink20@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0001-7766-7469
Section III. History
Training of Teachers of Theological Educational Institutions at the Alexander Nevsky Theological Academy (1797-1808)
Article reference:
Rezepina A. Podgotovka uchitelej duhovnyh uchebnyh zavedenij v Aleksandro-Nevskoj duhovnoj akademii (1797-1808 gg.) [Training of teachers of theological educational institutions at the Alexander Nevsky Theological Academy (1797-1808)] // Trudy Saratovskoj Pravoslavnoj Duhovnoj Seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 107-125. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_107
Abstract
Based on the analysis of unpublished documents from the Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA) and the Central State Historical Archive of St. Petersburg (CGIA SPb), the article examines the preparation for teaching positions of students of the philosophical and theological classes of the Alexander Nevsky Theological Academy sent from diocesan seminaries. The features of the curriculum of the Alexander Nevsky Theological Academy are analyzed, and the academy's status as a privileged theological educational institution is substantiated. Information about the performance of the seminarians and their behavior is provided. The conclusion is made about the level of preparation of the seminary students for further studies at the metropolitan Academy. Based on the study of the seminarians' petitions, their attitude to studying at the Alexander Nevsky Academy and the prospect of transfer to the St. Petersburg Diocese is reconstructed. Attention is paid to the consideration of the positions of diocesan bishops on the issues presented above. The article considers the future fate of the seminarians after graduating from the Alexander Nevsky Academy (returning to the diocesan seminary as a teacher or staying in the St. Petersburg diocese). Based on the analysis of the legislative acts of the Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire (PSZ RI) and the Complete Collection of resolutions and orders on the Department of the Orthodox Confession of the Russian Empire (PSPiRPVPI RI), conclusions are drawn about the attitude of the autocracy to spiritual education, an important component of which is the preparation of a seminarian for a teaching position.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Adamov M.A. (2011) "Povsednevnaya zhizn' uchashchihsya duhovnyh seminarij Russkoj Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi v XVIII — nachale XX vekov" [The daily life of students of theological seminaries of the Russian Orthodox Church in the XVIII — early XX centuries]. Thesis. Kursk. (In Russian).
2. Druzhinin A.V. (2025) "Podgotovka pastyrya v rossijskoj duhovnoj shkole. Osmyslenie, diskussiya i praktika: 1808-1869 gg." [Training of a pastor in a Russian theological school. Comprehension, discussion and practice: 1808-1869]. Moscow. (In Russian).
3. Goryanov O.A. (2006) "Istoriya Sankt-Peterburgskih duhovnyh shkol ot osnovaniya do reformy: 1721-1808 gody" [The history of St. Petersburg Theological schools from foundation to reform: 1721-1808]. In: "Hristianskoe chtenie" [Christian Reading]. No. 27. pp. 114-144. (In Russian).
4. Grigorieva I.L., Salonikov N.V. (2011) "Novgorodskaya duhovnaya seminariya: 1740-1918 gg. (K 270-letiyu so dnya osnovaniya)" [Novgorod Theological Seminary: 1740-1918 (On the 270th anniversary of its foundation)]. In: "Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta" [Bulletin of the Novgorod State University]. No. 63. pp. 34-38. (In Russian).
5. Panichkin A.F. (2016) "Aleksandro-Nevskaya seminariya v XVIII veke: uchashchiesya i izuchaemye nauki" [Alexander Nevsky Seminary in the XVIII century: students and studied sciences]. In: "Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoj duhovnoj seminarii" [Bulletin of the Yekaterinburg Theological Seminary]. Issue 4 (16). pp. 171-186. (In Russian).
6. Panichkin A.F. (2017) "Aleksandro-Nevskaya duhovnaya akademiya pri imperatore Pavla I. Izuchaemye nauki, uchitelya i uchashchihsya. Soderzhanie akademii" [Alexander Nevsky Theological Academy under Emperor Paul I. The studied sciences, teachers and students. The content of the Academy]. In: KLIO" [CLIO]. No. 2. pp. 112-115. (In Russian).
7. Rezepina A.A. (2024) "Aleksandro-Nevskaya akademiya: byt, obrazovanie, vospitanie (1796-1801 gg.)" [Alexander Nevsky Academy: life, education, upbringing (1796-1801)]. In: "Noyabr'skie chteniya - 2023: Sbornik statej po itogam XV Vserossijskoj konferencii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh" [November readings - 2023: Collection of articles on the results of the XV All-Russian Conference of Students, postgraduates and young scientists]. St. Petersburg. pp. 284-289. (In Russian).
8. Simora A.V. (2019) "Reformy v sisteme srednego duhovnogo obrazovaniya po podgotovke prosveshchennyh pastyrej russkoj pravoslavnoj cerkvi na rubezhe XIX-XX vekov v period dejstviya ustava duhovnyh seminarij 1884 g.". [Reforms in the system of secondary spiritual education for the training of enlightened pastors of the Russian Orthodox Church at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries during the period of the statute of theological seminaries in 1884]. In: "Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoj duhovnoj seminarii" [Bulletin of the Yekaterinburg Theological Seminary]. No. 3 (27). pp. 83-100. (In Russian).
9. Sukhova N.Y. (2010) "Aleksandrovskaya epoha i duhovnaya shkola: reforma 1808-1814 gg." [The Alexander Era and the theological school: thereform of 1808-1814]. In: "Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoriya i politicheskie nauki»" [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. The series "History and Political Sciences"]. No. 2 pp. 55-60. (In Russian).
10. Sushko A.V. (2010) "Duhovnye seminarii v poreformennoj Rossii (1861-1884 gg.)" [Theological seminaries in post-Reform Russia (1861-1884)]. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Author information
Anna Rezepina
Position: Leading specialist, Russian State Archive of Literature and Art; Student of Master's course, Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: 3 Vyborgskaya str., bldg. 2, Moscow, 125212; 6 Miusskaya square, Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation
Email: annrozen07@gmail.com
ORCID: 0009-0007-3366-8794
Metropolitan Filaret (Drozdov) and His Views on the Shortcomings of the Administrative Component of the Spiritual and Educational System of the Late 1840s
Article reference:
Ferapont (Shirokov P.), hegumen. Metropolitan Filaret (Drozdov) and His Views on the Shortcomings of the Administrative Component of the Spiritual and Educational System of the Late 1840s // Trudy Saratovskoj Pravoslavnoj Duhovnoj Seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 126–140. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_126
Abstract
Today, the personality and works of Metropolitan Filaret (Drozdov) of Moscow and Kolomna are a popular field for research. His activities in preparing the charter of 1808–1814, as well as his attitude to the reform of the theological school of N. A. Protasov and D. A. Tolstoy, are sufficiently covered. This article presents an analysis of Metropolitan Filaret's views on the problems of the theological-educational system, which were subject to wide discussion in the late 40s of the XIX century, especially in the context of the reaction in journalism. At this time, due to the cancellation of the call to the Holy Synod, Metropolitan Filaret focuses on the issues of diocesan administration, but does not abandon active church activities, as evidenced by the Metropolitan's written responses on various issues. The present study is based on an attempt to analyze the response of the Moscow Metropolitan to the project of one of the secular critics in 1849 on theological seminaries and the shortcomings of the administrative component of the theological school. Metropolitan Filaret carefully approached the identified problems and presented his opinion on the identified issues. The sources for the study were archival documents of the Russian State Historical Archive. As additional literature, materials of modern researchers of the life and legacy of Saint Filaret were used, which allows us to approach the most objective view of both the personality of the outstanding saint and his works. Based on the available materials, the author of the article shows the contribution of Metropolitan Filaret to church science and to the resolution of problems of the spiritual and educational system at the time in question.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Druzhinin A.V. (2023) "Podgotovka pastyrya v Rossiyskoy dukhovnoy shkole: osmysleniye, diskussiya i praktika (1808–1869 gg.)" [Training a Pastor in the Russian Theological School: Understanding, Discussion, and Practice (1808–1869)]. Thesis. Moscow. (In Russian).
2. Firsov S.L. (2024) "Istoriya Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi" [History of the Russian Orthodox Church]. Vol. 2. "Sinodal'nyy period" [Synodal Period]. Moscow. (In Russian).
3. Khodzinsky P., Bezhanidze G.V., Firsov A.G. (2024) "Filaret (Drozdov)" [Philaret (Drozdov)]. In: "Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya" [Orthodox Encyclopedia]. Vol. LXXII. Moscow. pp. 249–274. (In Russian).
4. Rimsky S.V. (1999) "Rossiyskaya tserkov' v epokhu Velikikh reform" [The Russian Church in the Era of the Great Reforms]. Moscow. (In Russian).
5. Sukhova N.Yu. (2006) "Vysshaya dukhovnaya shkola: problemy i reformy (vtoraya polovina XIX veka)" [Higher Theological School: Problems and Reforms (Second Half of the 19th Century)]. Moscow. (In Russian).
6. Sukhova N.Yu. (2011) "«Vospitaniye yunoshestva, Tserkvi posvyashchennogo»: dukhovno-uchebnaya reforma 1808–1814 gg. i svyatitel' Filaret" ["Education of the Young People Dedicated to the Church": The Theological and Educational Reform of 1808–1814 and Saint Philaret]. In: "Filaretovskiy Al'manakh" [Philaretovsky Almanac]. No. 7. pp. 140–162. (In Russian).
Author information
Hegumen Ferapont (Pavel Shirokov)
Position: Candidate of Theology, Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for Educational Work, Secretary of the Academic Council, Associate Professor of the Department of Church Historical Disciplines at Vologda Theological Seminary
Address: Russian Federation, 160901, Vologda, Monastyrskaya str., 2
Email: ierom.ferapont@yandex.ru
ORCID: 0000-0001-5514-9193
The Dissolution of Marriage in the Nizhny Novgorod Province in the Late XIX — Early XX Centuries
Article reference:
Arkhipova N. Rastorzheniye brachnogo soyuza v Nizhegorodskoy gubernii v kontse XIX – nachale XX veka [The dissolution of marriage in the Nizhny Novgorod province in the late XIX — early XX centuries] // Trudy Saratovskoj Pravoslavnoj Duhovnoj Seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 141–159. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_141
Abstract
In the article, for the first time, using unpublished archival data of the Nizhny Novgorod Spiritual Consistory, the problem of divorce among the orthodox population of the Nizhny Novgorod province in the late XIX — early XX centuries is studied. The author aims to determine the main causes of divorces and the dynamics of changes in the number of divorce cases in the Nizhny Novgorod province. The author concludes that at the turn of the XIXth and XXth centuries, the number of official divorces among the Orthodox population of the province was insignificant. Legislation, limiting the number of reasons for divorce, gave rise to the practice of unofficial long-term separation of spouses. It has been established that at the end of the XIXth century, the dominant reason for the dissolution of marriage was the exile of one of the spouses to hard labor and to settlement in Siberia. Since 1906, the number of divorce cases had been on the rise. The trend of increasing applications for divorce on the grounds of adultery, which had become the leading reason for the termination of marriage since 1906, has been revealed. It was found that in 1915, compared with 1906, against the background of a decrease in the total number of claims, the proportion of satisfied claims increased by 1,7 times. The appearance of the first Soviet laws that facilitated the divorce process led to a sharp increase in the number of petitions to the Nizhny Novgorod Consistory. The article may be of interest to researchers studying the history of the family.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Arkhipova N.E. (2016) "Religiozno-nravstvennoye sostoyaniye zhiteley Nizhegorodskoy gubernii vo vtoroy polovine XIX — nachala XX vv." [Religious and moral state of the inhabitants of the Nizhny Novgorod province in the second half of the 19th — early 20th centuries]. In: "Nauchnyy dialog" [Scientific dialogue]. No. 2 (50). pp. 198–206. (In Russian).
2. Belosludtseva V.V. (2020) "«Kak zhe ya mogu zhenit'sya na tebe, kogda ya zhenat?»: o rastorzhenii braka v Permskoy gubernii v kontse XIX — nachale XX veka" [“How can I marry you when I'm married?”: on divorce in the Perm province in the late 19th — early 20th centuries]. In: "Vestnik Permskogo un-ta. Istoriya" [Bulletin of Perm University. History]. Iss. 4 (51). pp. 117–126. (In Russian).
3. Belyakova E. (2002) "Bab'i stony: kak razvodilis' v Rossiyskoy imperii" [Women's groans: how they got divorced in the Russian Empire]. In: "Rodina" [Rodina]. No. 7. pp. 63–64. (In Russian).
4. Dorskaya A.A. (2007) "Grazhdanskiy razvod v Rossiyskoy imperii: istoriko-pravovoy aspekt" [Civil divorce in the Russian Empire: historical and legal aspect]. In: "Istoriya gosudarstva i prava" [History of the state and law]. No. 6. pp. 6–8. (In Russian).
5. Isachenkova A.I. (2006) "Dokumentirovaniye brakorazvodnogo protsessa v dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii" [Documenting Divorce Proceedings in Pre-Revolutionary Russia]. In: "Deloproizvodstvo" [Office Proceedings]. No. 1. pp. 78–86. (In Russian).
6. Maksimova T. (1998) "Razvod po-russki" [Divorce, Russian Style]. In: "Rodina" [Homeland]. No. 9. pp. 55–60. (In Russian).
7. Mironov B.N. (2000) "Sotsial'naya istoriya Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII — nachalo XX v.)" [Social History of Russia during the Imperial Period (18th — Early 20th Century)]. In 2 Vols. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
8. Rashin A.G. "Naseleniye Rossii za 100 let (1813–1913). Statisticheskiye ocherki" [Population of Russia for 100 Years (1813–1913). Statistical Essays]. Available from: https://istmat.org/node/72 (28/12/2024). (In Russian).
9. Spichak A.V. (2017) "Prichiny razvodov krest'yanok v kontse XIX — nachale XX v. (Na materialakh Tobol'skoy yeparkhii)" [Causes of divorces of peasant women in the late 19th — early 20th centuries. (Based on the materials of the Tobolsk diocese)]. In: "Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve" [Woman in Russian society]. No. 4 (85). pp. 88–103. (In Russian).
10. Vanyushina O.V. (2024) "«Razdel'naya zhizn' suprugov ne dayet im prava vozbuzhdat' isk o rastorzhenii braka…»: razvody v Rossii v kontse XIX — nachale XX vekov (po materialam Tverskoy gubernii)" [“The separate life of spouses does not give them the right to file a lawsuit for divorce...”: divorces in Russia in the late 19th — early 20th centuries (based on the materials of the Tver province)]. In: "Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta" [Bulletin of Udmurt University]. Vol. 34, Iss. 1. pp. 87–96. (In Russian).
11. Yunusova L.V. (2010) "Brakorazvodnyy protsess v seredine XIX — nachale XX veka (po materialam Tobol'skoy gubernii)" [Divorce proceedings in the mid-19th — early 20th centuries (based on the materials of the Tobolsk province)]. In: "Istoricheskiye issledovaniya v Sibiri: problemy i perspektivy" [Historical research in Siberia: problems and prospects]. pp. 118–122. (In Russian).
12. Zapevalova E.A. (2017) "Naseleniye Nizhegorodskoy oblasti v usloviyakh transformiruyushcheysya sotsiokul'turnoy sredy (vtoraya polovina XIX — nachalo XX veka). Braki, razvody" [Population of the Nizhny Novgorod region in the context of a transforming socio-cultural environment (second half of the 19th — early 20th century). Marriages, divorces]. In: "Sotsiodinamika" [Sociodynamics]. No. 5. pp. 1–12. (In Russian).
13. Zubareva O.G. (2017) "Vliyaniye pervykh dekretov sovetskoy vlasti na stanovleniye sovremennogo semeynogo zakonodatel'stva" [The Influence of the First Decrees of the Soviet Government on the Formation of Modern Family Legislation]. In: "Severo-Kavkazskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik" [North Caucasian Legal Bulletin]. No. 4. pp. 80–84. (In Russian).
Author information
Natalya Arkhipova
Position: Candidate of Sciences in History, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Social and Law Sciences, Volga State University of Water Transport; Associate Professor of the Department of History, Philology and Church Practical Disciplines, Nizhny Novgorod Theological Seminary
Address: Russian Federation, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, 5 Nesterova str.; 603001, Nizhny Novgorod, 5 Pokhvalinsky Exit str.
Email: arx78@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-2770-680X
Publications
The Church Chronicle of Archpriest Sergiy Samuilov. The Revolutionary Unrest of the Peasants of Samara Province in 1905 Through the Eyes of a Contemporary
Reference to publication:
Vdovin E., priest. The Church Chronicle of Archpriest Sergiy Samuilov. The Revolutionary Unrest of the Peasants of Samara Province in 1905 Through the Eyes of a Contemporary // Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary. 2025. No. 2 (29). pp. 160–179. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_160
Abstract
This article is based on the chronicle of Archpriest Sergius Samuilov, rector of the Church of the Nativity of Christ in the village of Bolshaya Tsarevshchyna, Samara district, Samara province. It should be noted that church chronicles themselves are rare documents. The Samara State Archive contains only nine chronicles from the pre-revolutionary period. Father Sergius's chronicle has been preserved better than others. Additionally, this document is interesting because it describes vivid and significant events in the life of the Samara diocese, such as the revolutionary movement of peasants in the villages of Bolshaya Tsarevshchyna and Stary Buyan in Samara district in 1905. This document is also remarkable because its author—a man undoubtedly endowed with literary talent—describes the events he observed very vividly and comprehensively, while remaining a true chronicler, as detached as possible and politically independent. Having a close connection with his flock and being well aware of the moods and needs of the population, Father Sergius shows us how the revolutionary movement of 1905 began, who its initiators were, and how the ideas of the revolution influenced the life of the Church and society. Thanks to the preserved chronicle of Archpriest Sergiy Samuilov, we have the opportunity to view the revolutionary events in the village of Bolshaya Tsarevshchyna through the eyes of a contemporary. On one hand, we see the complete absurdity of the behavior of revolutionarily minded people, ready to kill their neighbors for unclear prospects, not to mention representatives of authority. On the other hand, we see the selfless and honest service of a simple rural priest, faithfully fulfilling his pastoral duty and resisting persecution and harassment by revolutionaries.
Keywords:
References
Show list ▼1. Astapov A.A. (2009) "Vospominaniya starogo bukinista" [Memoirs of an old second-hand bookseller]. Moscow. (In Russian).
2. Borodyanskaya L.I., Zakharova F.P. et al. (1955) "Revolyutsiya 1905– 1907 gg. v g. Samare i Samarskoy gubernii. Dokumenty i materialy" [Revolution 1905–1907. in Samara and Samara province. Documents and materials]. Kuibyshev. (In Russian).
3. Emelyakh L.I. (1965) "Antiklerikal'noye dvizheniye krest'yan v period pervoy russkoy revolyutsii" [Anti-clerical movement of peasants during the first Russian revolution]. Moscow, Leningrad. (In Russian).
4. Kabytov P.S., Khramkov L.V. (1993) "Samarskaya letopis' Ocherki istorii Samar. kraya s drevneyshikh vremen do nach. XX v." [Samara Chronicle Essays on the history of Samara. region from ancient times to the beginning. XX century]. In 2 books. Samara. (In Russian).
5. Kokarev M. (2016) "Sistema upravleniya Samarskoy yeparkhii v predsobornyy period (1894–1917)" [The management system of the Samara diocese in the pre-conciliar period (1894–1917)]. Moscow. (In Russian).
6. Yakunin V.N. (2011) "Istoriya Samarskoy yeparkhii" [History of the Samara diocese]. Tolyatti. (In Russian).
Author Information
Priest Evgeny Vdovin
Position: rector of the Church of the Vladimir Icon of the Mother of God in the urban-type settlement of Alekseevka, Kinel Diocese of Samara Metropolis; master's student at Minsk Theological Academy named after St. Cyril, Bishop of Turov
Address: Russian Federation, 446441, Samara Region, Kinel, urban-type settlement Alekseevka, Ulyanovskaya St. 1a; Republic of Belarus, 220030, Minsk, Zybitskaya St., 27
Email: vdovin.72@internet.ru
Reviews
Prolegomena to the Study of St. Paul the Apostle: Comparative Religion and Historical Criticism Versus Theological Tradition?
Reference:
Kovshov M. Prolegomeny k izucheniyu svyatogo apostola Pavla: sravnitel'noye religiovedeniye i istoricheskaya kritika protiv bogoslovskoy traditsii? [Prolegomena to the study of St. Paul the apostle: comparative religion and historical criticism versus theological tradition?]. Book review: Patrick Hart. A Prolegomenon to the Study of Paul. (Supplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 15). Leiden: Brill, 2020. 234 p. // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2025. No 2 (29). pp.180–189. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2025_29_180
Reviewed work:
Hart P. A Prolegomenon to the Study of Paul. (Supplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. Vol. 15). Leiden: Brill, 2020. 234 p.
References
Show list ▼1. Hart P. (2020) A Prolegomenon to the Study of Paul. (Supplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion). Vol. 15. Leiden. (In English).
2. Kazinov V.A. (2019) "K voprosu ob ispol'zovanii apostolom Pavlom sekretarskoy pomoshchi pri napisanii poslaniy" [On the Issue of the Apostle Paul's Use of Secretarial Assistance in Writing Epistles]. In: "Trudy Kolomenskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Transactions of the Kolomna Theological Seminary]. No. 13. pp. 76–97. (In Russian).
3. Kazinov V.A. (2020) "K voprosu atributsii poslaniy apostola Pavla v sovremennoy bibleistike: formirovaniye korpusa Paulinum v kontekste praktiki psevdonimii antichnogo mira" [On the Issue of Attribution of the Epistles of the Apostle Paul in Modern Biblical Studies: Formation of the Paulinum Corpus in the Context of the Practice of Pseudonymy in the Ancient World]. In: "Aktual'nyye voprosy tserkovnoy nauki" [Actual Issues of Church Science]. No. 2. pp. 101–112. (In Russian).
4. Kazinov V.A. (2021) "Vopros o kanonicheskoy psevdoepigrafii v novozavetnykh bibleyskikh issledovaniyakh" [The Question of Canonical Pseudepigraphy in New Testament Biblical Studies]. In: "Trudy Kolomenskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Transactions of the Kolomna Theological Seminary]. No. 15. pp. 59–70. (In Russian).
5. Kazinov V.A. (2023) "Podkhody v reshenii voprosa avtorstva poslaniya k Yefesyanam v zarubezhnykh bibleyskikh issledovaniyakh" [Approaches to Resolving the Issue of the Authorship of the Epistle to the Ephesians in Foreign Biblical Studies]. In: "Trudy Kolomenskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Proceedings of the Kolomna Theological Seminary]. No. 3 (22). pp. 8–26. (In Russian).
6. Kazinov V.A. (2023) "Podkhody v reshenii voprosa avtorstva poslaniya k Kolossyanam v zarubezhnykh bibleyskikh issledovaniyakh XX — nachala XXI vv." [Approaches to Resolving the Issue of the Authorship of the Epistle to the Colossians in Foreign Biblical Studies of the 20th — Early 21st Centuries]. In: "Trudy Kolomenskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Proceedings of the Kolomna Theological Seminary]. No. 4 (23). pp. 16–46. (In Russian).
7. Kazinov V.A. (2024) "Obzor voprosa avtorstva poslaniy apostola Pavla v khristianskoy traditsii" [A Review of the Issue of the Authorship of the Epistles of the Apostle Paul in the Christian Tradition]. In: "Trudy Kolomenskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Proceedings of the Kolomna Theological Seminary]. No. 1 (24). pp. 8–37. (In Russian).
8. Kovshov M.V. "Chto na samom dele napisal apostol Pavel? «Devteropauliny» i ikh mesto v kanone Novogo Zaveta" [What did the Apostle Paul actually write? "Deutero-Paulinae" and their place in the New Testament canon]. Available at: https://stavroskrest.ru/sites/default/files/files/pdf/chto-na-samom-dele-napisal-apostol-pavel.pdf (15/02/2025). (In Russian).
9. Kovshov M.V. (2023) "Poslaniye k Yevreyam «stikh za stikhom»: o novom kommentarii k samomu vetkhozavetnomu pis'mu svyatogo apostola Pavla" [The Epistle to the Hebrews "Verse by Verse": On a New Commentary on the Old Testament Letter of St. Paul the Apostle]. Review of the book: Osborne G.R., Guthrie G.H. Hebrews: Verse by Verse / Osborne New Testament Commentaries. Bellingham: Lexham Press, 2021. 360 р. In: "Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii" [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. No. 3 (22). pp. 125–135. (In Russian).
10. Kovshov M.V. (2024) "Vetkhiy Zavet i apostol yazychnikov: Pisaniye, teksty i allyuzii v Pervom poslanii svyatogo apostola Pavla k Korinfyanam" [The Old Testament and the Apostle of the Gentiles: Scripture, Texts, and Tracings in 1 Corinthians (Scripture and Paul)]. Review of the book: Scripture, Texts, and Tracings in 1 Corinthians (Scripture and Paul). Edited by Linda Belleville and B. J. Oropeza. Lexington: Fortress Academic, 2019. 296 p. In: "Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii" [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. No. 1 (24). pp. 152–159. (In Russian).
11. Talankina M.V. (2024) "Soteriologicheskiy podkhod v bibleistike: postanovka problemy" [Soteriological Approach in Biblical Studies: Statement of the Problem]. In: "Khristianskoye chteniye" [Christian Reading]. No. 3. pp. 27–37. (In Russian).
Author information
Mikhail Kovshov
Degree: Candidate of Theology, Associate Professor
Position: Associate Professor of the Department of Biblical Studies
Institution: Moscow Theological Academy
Address: Russian Federation, 141300, Moscow Region, Sergiev Posad, Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra
Additional position: Researcher
Institution: Perervinskaya Orthodox Theological Seminary
Address: Russian Federation, 109383, Moscow, 82 Highway str.
Email: paul.quest@nextmail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0003-0656-1135