на русском
I. Theology
Archpriest Andrei Fadeev
The Cultic Milieu in Christopher Partridge's researches
For citation:
Fadeev A.Y., archpriest. Kul'tovaya sreda obshchestva v issledovaniyah Kristofera Partridzha [The Cultic Milieu in Christopher Partridge's researches] // Trudy Saratovskoj pravoslavnoj duhovnoj seminarii [Proceeding of the Saratov Orthodox Seminary]. 2023. № 3(22). рр. 11–25. DOI: 10/56621/27825884_2023_22_11
Abstract: Within the framework of this article, two concepts are specified and compared — "the Cultic Milieu" and "occulture". Comparison and analysis of the results of cultural and sociological approaches make it possible to distinguish their strengths and weaknesses. Transmitting religious narratives within cultural phenomena is the central idea behind the concept of "occulture". The concept of the Cultic Milieu was introduced into the scientific discourse by Colin Campbell in 1972. The Cultic Milieu as defined by its author is deviant beliefs and practices of the cultural underground, rooted in historical experience. Comparing the characteristics of these concepts reveals the degree of their heuristicity in the field of studying unconventional and non-institutionalized religiosity.
Keywords: The Cultic Milieu, the concept of C. Partridge's "oсculture", individual religiosity, unconventional religiosity, non-institutionalized religiosity, esotericism, hysterics, bricoler.
References:
Show less Show more
1. Asprem E. (2012) Arguing with Angels: Enochian Magic and Modern Occulture. NY. (in English).
2. Asprem E. (2014) The Problem of Disenchantment: Scientific Naturalism and Esoteric Discourse 1900–1939. Leiden. (in English).
3. Campbell C. (1972) The Cult, the Cult Millieu and Secularization. In: A Sociological Yearbook on Religion in Britain. Vol. 5. pp. 119–136. (in English).
4. Campbell C. (1977) Clarifying the cult. In: British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 28. pp. 375–388. (in English).
5. Campbell C. (2010) The Easternisation of the West: or, how the West was lost. In: Asian Journal of Social Scienct. Vol. 38/5. pp. 738–757. (in English).
6. Hanegraaff W. (2016) "Zapadnyy ezoterizm. Putevoditel' dlya zaputavshikhsya" [Western Esotericism. A guide for the confused]. Moscow. (in Russian).
7. Martinovich V.A. (2018) "Sektantstvo: vozniknoveniye i migratsiya" [Sectarianism: emergence and migration]. Moscow. (in Russian).
8. Nosachev P.G. (2018) "Issledovaniya zapadnogo ezoterizma v zarubezhnom religiovedenii" [Studies of Western Esotericism in Foreign Religious Studies]. Thesis. Moscow. (in Russian).
9. Partridge C. (2004) The Re-Enchantment of the West: Vol. 1: Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occultur. L. (in English).
10. Partridge C. (2005) The Re-Enchantment of the West: Vol. 2: Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization, Popular Culture, and Occultur. L. (in English).
11. Partridge C. (2010) Dub In Babylon: The Emergence and Influence of Dub Reggae in Jamaica and Britain from King Tubby to Post-punk. L. (in English).
12. Stark R., Bainbridge W. (1985) The Future of Religion: Secularization, Revival and Cult Formation. Berkley. (in English).
13. Stuckrad Kocku von. Locations of Knowledge in Medieval and Early Modern Europe: Esoteric Discourse and Western Identities. Leiden. (in English).
14. Troeltsch. E. (1931) The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches. Vol. 2. L. (in English).
15. Truzzi M. (1972) The Occult Revival as Popular Culture: Some Random Observations on the Old and the Nouveau Witch. In: The Sociological Quarterly. Vol. 13. No. 1. pp. 16–36. (in English).
16. Yeats F. (2000) "Dzhordano Bruno i germeticheskaya traditsiya" [Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition]. Moscow. (in Russian).
Author information:
Archpriest Andrei Fadeev;
Candidate of Theology, Associate Professor;
Associate Professor, Department of Biblical Studies and Theology ;
Penza Orthodox Тheological Seminary;
4 Perekop str., Penza 440023, Russian Federation;
Email: fadeevandrei@mail.ru.
ORCID: 0000-0001-6973-6081
Read full text (in Russian) (pdf)
Archpriest Dmitry Usoltsev, Archpriest Anatoly Strakhov
The theme of the end of the world in the Second Epistle of the Apostle Peter
For citation:
Usoltsev D., archpriest, Strakhov A., archpriest. Tema kontsa mira vo Vtorom Poslanii apostola Petra [The theme of the end of the world in the Second Epistle of the Apostle Peter] // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2023. No 3 (22). pp. 26–42. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2023_22_26
Abstract: This article attempts to study the eschatological motives in the preaching of the Apostle Peter on the example of Chapter 3 of his Second Epistle. After analyzing the general context of biblical eschatology and studying the isagogical data regarding the given Epistle, the authors consider the socio-historical and ideological situation in the Christian world at the time of writing the Second Epistle of Peter. Issues related to the disputes concerning the authenticity of this message, as well as its connection with the apocryphal "Apocalypse of Peter" are touched upon. A textual and exegetical analysis of individual fragments of Chapter 3 is carried out. The theme of correlations between the eschatological teachings of the apostles Peter and Paul is analyzed. On the basis of the conducted analysis a conclusion is made about the place of the question of the end of the world in the sermon of the Apostle Peter as a whole as well as about the role of this issue in opposition of the Church to false teachings and schisms.
Keywords: Apostle Peter, Apostle Paul, Second Epistle of Peter, General Epistles, eschatology, apocalypse.
References:
Show less
Show more
2. Craig K. (2005) "Bibleyskiy kul'turno-istoricheskiy kommentariy. V 2 chastyakh. Chast' 2: Novyy Zavet" [Biblical Cultural-Historical Commentary. In 2 parts. Part 2: New Testament]. Saint Petersburg. (in Russian).
3. Cranfield C.E.B. (1960) I&II Peter and Jude: Introduction and Commentary. London. (in English).
4. Davidenko A.O. (2022) "Problema interpretatsii ponyatiy «uderzhivayushchiy» i «uderzhivayushcheye»: istoricheskiy obzor tolkovaniy na 2 Fes. 2, 6–7" [The Problem of Interpreting the Concepts "Retaining" and "Retaining": A Historical Survey of Interpretations on 2 Thess. 2, 6–7]. Trudy Saratovskoy pravoslavnoy dukhovnoy seminarii [Proceedings of the Saratov OrthodoX Theological Seminary]. No. 1 (16). pp. 23–30. (in Russian).
5. Kublitskaya E.A. (2021) "Sotsial'nyye i religioznyye oriyentatsii moskvichey v usloviyakh pandemii" [Social and religious orientations of Muscovites in a pandemic]. In: "Vyzovy pandemii i strategicheskaya povestka dnya dlya obshchestva i gosudarstva: sotsial'no-politicheskoye polozheniye i demograficheskaya situatsiya v 2021 godu" [Challenges of a pandemic and a strategic agenda for society and the state: socio- political situation and demographic situation in 2021]. Moscow. (in Russian).
6. Mikhail (Luzin). (2009) "Tolkovyy Apostol. V 5 knigakh. Kniga 3. Tolkovaniye Sobornykh Poslaniy" [Intelligent Apostle. In 5 books. Book 3. Interpretation of the Epistles of the Council]. Moscow. (in Russian).
7. Moffatt J. (1928) The general epistles: James, Peter and Judas. London. (in English).
8. Shturbabin S.A., Orlov M.O., Petrova K.Yu. (2022) "Teologicheskoye znaniye v svetskom obrazovatel'nom prostranstve: problemy i puti razvitiya dialoga" [Theological knowledge in the secular educational space: problems and ways of developing dialogue]. In: "Trudy Saratovskoy pravoslavnoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Proceedings of the Saratov OrthodoX Theological Seminary]. No. 2 (17). pp. 59–80. (in Russian).
9. Vorontsova L.M., Filatov S.B., Furman D.E. (1995) "Religiya v sovremennom massovom soznanii" [Religion in modern mass consciousness]. In: "Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya" [Sociological research]. No. 11. pp. 81–91. (in Russian).
10. Windisch H. (1951) Die katholischen Briefe [The Catholic Epistles]. In: Handbuch zum Neuen Testament [Handbook to the New Testament]. Vol. 15. Tübingen. (in German).
Authors information:
Archpriest Dmitry Usoltsev;
Candidate of Theology;
Associate Professor, Department of Biblical Studies, Secretary of the Academic Council;
Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary;
92 Michurina str., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation;
Email:
resurexit@list.ruORCID: 0000-0002-1463-3648
Archpriest Anatoly Strakhov;
Candidate of Theology;
Associate Professor, Department of Biblical Studies;
Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary;
92 Michurina str., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation;
Email:
s.vostok@mail.ruORCID: 0000-0001-5580-6173
Read full text (in Russian) (pdf)
Archpriest Sergei Shturbabin, Kristina Petrova
The dogma of papal infallibility in the Roman Catholic Church: doctrine and social aspects
For citation:
Shturbabin S., archpriest, Petrova K. Dogmat o papskoy nepo- greshimosti v Rimsko-Katolicheskoy Tserkvi: verouchitel'nyye i sotsial'nyye aspekty [The dogma of papal infallibility in the Roman Catholic Church: doctrine and social aspects] // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2023. No 3 (22). pp. 43–60. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2023_22_43
Abstract: Thе article analyzes the theological and historical features of the declaration of the dogma of papal infallibility. Considering that this very provision of the modern Catholic teaching is interpreted by many OrthodoX theologians as one of the key and insurmountable differences between OrthodoXy and Catholicism, it seems quite relevant to raise the question of how this dogma is inherent in the theological logic of Catholicism. The analysis of the historical, canonical, socio-political prerequisites for the development of the doctrine of papal infallibility reveals the determining influence of the socio-political component on the acceptance of this doctrine. The study also provides an overview of the main directions of the reception of the decision of the First Vatican Council and concludes that the social component has been underestimated by many researchers.
Keywords: Roman Catholic Church, Pope of Rome, First Vatican Council, papism, conciliarism, papal infallibility, Infallibilitas, ex cathedra, comparative theology.
References:
Show less
Show more
1. Bulgakov S. (1929) "Ocherki ucheniya o Tserkvi. 4. O Vatikanskom dogmate" [Essays on the doctrine of the Church. 4. About the Vatican dogma]. In: "Put'" [Path]. No. 15 (February). pp. 39–81. (in Russian).
2. Gergely E. (1996) "Istoriya papstva" [History of the papacy]. Moscow. (in Russian).
3. Hasler A. (1981) How the Pope Became Infallible: Pius IX and the Politics of Persuasion. N.Y. (in English).
4. Kimlenko E.A. (2021) "Piy IX v 1846–1848 gg. — papa-liberal?" [Pius IX in 1846–1848 — Liberal Pope?] // "Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnyye nauki" [Bulletin of the Yaroslavl State University named P.G. Demidov. Series Humanities]. Vol. 15. No. 4 (58). pp. 526–531. DOI 10.18255/1996-5648-2021-4-526-531. (in Russian).
5. Kozlov M., Ogitsky D.P. (2009) "Zapadnoye khristianstvo. Vzglyad s Vostoka" [Western Christianity. View from the East]. Moscow. (in Russian).
6. Leoni F. (2001) Storia dei partiti politici italiani [History of Italian political parties]. Napoli. (in Italian).
7. Martina G. (1990) Pio IX (1867–1878) [Pope IX (1867–1878)]. Roma. (in Italian).
8. Orekhanov G. (2013) "Retseptsiya resheniy I Vatikanskogo sobora v Rossii" [Reception of decisions of the First Vatican Council in Russia] // "Khristianskoye chteniye" [Christian Reading]. No. 3. pp. 86–100. (in Russian).
9. Pilipenko E.A. "Nepogreshimost' papy rimskogo" [Infallibility of the Pope] // "Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya" [OrthodoX Encyclopedia]. Vol. 49. pp. 10–15. Available at: https://www.pravenc.ru/text/2565042.html (05/23/2023). (in Russian).
10. Shilov E. (comp.). (2020) "Katolitsizm: Khrestomatiya po predmetu «Sravnitel'noye bogosloviye»" [Catholicism: A Reader in Comparative Theology]. Saint Petersburg. (in Russian).
11. Vilmer J-B. J. (2006) Lamartine et Pie IX: la France face à la question nationale italienne en 1846–1849 [Lamartine and Pius IX: France Facing the Italian National Question in 1846–1849]. Genève. pp. 71–85. (in French).
Authors information:
Archpriest Sergei Shturbabin;
Candidate of Theology;
Associate Professor, Department of Church History, Associate Professor, Department of Theology, Rector;
Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary;
92 Michurina str., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation;
Email:
rectorsarpds@yandex.ruORCID: 0000-0002-3836-8500
Kristina Petrova;Junior researcher, Lecturer, Department of Theology;
Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary;
92 Michurina str., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation;
Email:
petra-velikaya@ya.ruORCID: 0000-0003-4529-6709
Read full text (in Russian) (pdf)
Dmitry Semenenko
The current state of Christianity in Southeast Asia: problems and prospects of missionary activity
For citation:
Semenenko D. Sovremennoye sostoyaniye khristianstva v Yugo- Vostochnoy Azii: problemy i perspektivy missionerskoy deyatel'nosti [The current state of Christianity in Southeast Asia: problems and prospects of missionary activity] // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2023. No 3 (22). pp. 61–79. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2023_22_61
Abstract: This article is devoted to the study of the position of Christianity in Southeast Asia. The text analyzes the historical, social, geopolitical, economic, ethnic, cultural and other aspects of the region under study. The history of the Christianization of the region within the framework of the main branches of Christianity is briefly reproduced. The role of the missionary efforts of the Russian OrthodoX Church in this region is noted. The phenomenon of the formation of mega-churches in the region is touched upon. The main research attention is focused on the current position of Christianity in Southeast Asia. Considerable attention is paid to the so-called "Islamic revival" in the region, as well as to the peculiarities of the interaction of Christianity with Islam and Buddhism. The main problems and contradictions that impede the Christianization of the region are analyzed.
Keywords: Southeast Asia, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, South Korea, megachurch, Chinese Mission, Patriarchal EXarchate of Southeast Asia.
References:
Show less Show more
1. Chupungco A.J. (2004) The Filipino Catholics and their life of worship and prayer. Popular religiosity among Filipino Catholics. In: Docete. No 26. pp. 20–33. (in English).
2. Cornelio J.S. (2014) Popular religion and the turn to everyday authenticity reflections on the contemporary study of Philippine. In: Catholicism. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints. No 62. pp. 471–500. (in English).
3. Flaherty R.P. (2011) Korean millennial movements. In: The OXford handbook of millennialism. OXford, pp. 305–336. (in English).
4. Le V.H. (2014) Reconizing traditional collective identity for improving the quality of learning in Vietnamese higher education. In: International Journal of Research In Social Sciences. Vol. 4. No. 8. pp. 42–47. (in English).
5. Nagata J. (1997) Ethnonationalism versus Religious Transnationalism: Nation-Building and Islam in Malaysia. In: The Muslim World. Vol. 87. Issue 2. pp. 129–150. (in English).
6. Neo J.L. (2006) Malay Nationalism, Islamic Supremacy and the Constitutional Bargain in the Multi-Ethnic Composition of Malaysia. In: International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. No 13 (1). pp. 95–118. (in English).
7. Phan T. (2015) Study on current public opinion in Vietnam based on universally value system and core values approach. In: Open Journal of Social Sciences. No 3. pp. 113–119. (in English).
8. Sadan M. (2014) Religion. Identity and separatism. In: Burma. Copenhagen, pp. 50–61. (in English).
9. Stuart-FoX M. (2010) Laos: From Buddhist kingdom to Marxist state. In: Buddhism and politics in twentieth-century Asia. London, pp. 150–161. (in English).
10. Van V.H. (2020) From the Belief of the Immortality of the Soul. The Blessing or the Harassing of the Soul towards People to the Worship of the Souls of Vietnamese People. In: Asian Social Science. No 16 (3). pp. 10–18. (in English).
Author information:
Dmitry Semenenko;
postgraduate student, Ss Cyril and Methodius Institute of Post-Graduate Studies;
4/2 Pyatnitskaya str., bld. 1, Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation;
Email: semenenkods@yandex.ru
Read full text (in Russian) (pdf)
II. Philosophy
Mikhail Bogatov
Correlation of practical prudence (φρόνησις) and wisdom (σοφία) in Aristotle's ethical project
For citation:
Bogatov M. Sootnosheniye prakticheskoy rassuditel'nosti (φρόνησις) i mudrosti (σοφία) v eticheskom proyekte Aristotelya [Correlation of practical prudence (φρόνησις) and wisdom (σοφία) in Aristotle's ethical project] // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2023. No 3 (22). pp. 80–90. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2023_22_80
Abstract: This article focuses on the divergence of views on the leading role of wisdom between the young Aristotle and Plato. While Plato unequivocally assignes a dominant role in the entire hierarchy of human abilities to wisdom (σοφία), and therefore believes that only a sage can be happy, Aristotle carefully frees up space for the opportunity to be happy for those people who are not directly involved in philosophy. Subsequently, this project of Aristotle manifests itself in all its force in his Ethics. Based on fragments of the Protrepticus, the earliest text of Aristotle that has come down to us, we follow the Aristotelian strategy of separating wisdom (σοφία) from practical judgment (φρόνησις).
Keywords: Aristotle, Plato, wisdom, practical prudence, happiness.
References:
Show less Show more
1. Bibikhin V.V. (2011) "Les" [Forest]. Saint Petersburg. (in Russian).
2. Chernyakov A.G. (2001) "Ontologiya vremeni. Bytiye i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya i Khaydeggera" [Ontology of time. Being and time in the philosophy of Aristotle, Husserl and Heidegger]. Saint Petersburg. (in Russian).
3. Jaeger W. (1923) Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung [Aristotle: Fundamentals of the history of his development]. Berlin. (in German).
4. Sedakova O.A. (2004) "Poetika obryada. Pogrebal'naya obryadnost' vostochnykh i yuzhnykh slavyan" [Poetics of the rite. Funeral rituals of the Eastern and Southern Slavs]. Moscow. (in Russian).
Author information: :
Mikhail Bogatov;
Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Associate Professor;
Professor, Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy;
Saratov State University;
10A Volskaya str., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation;
III. History
Sergey Maksimov
The problem of the transmission of the Latin titles of Origen's treatise “On First Principles” in manuscripts of the gamma family
For citation:
Maximov S. Problema peredachi latinskikh titulov traktata Origena «O nachalakh» v rukopisyakh semeystva gamma [The problem of the transmission of the Latin titles of Origen's treatise “On First Principles” in manuscripts of the gamma family] // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2023. No 3 (22). pp. 91–110. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2023_22_91
Abstract: The article analyzes the manuscripts of the gamma family of the Latin translation of Origen’s treatise “On First Principles” in order to study the transmission of the Latin titles of the work. A review of critical editions of the treatise and scientific literature related to the study of the history of transmission of its Latin titles is given. Conclusions of the previous articles suggesting correcting Latin manuscript stemma presented in modern critical editions of the treatise are summarized. The author focuses on the table of contents of the treatise, which is presented in most gamma manuscripts. The data of other works included in all gamma manuscripts is used to clarify the problem under study. The theory of the existence of notes in the margins of the archetype of all known manuscripts of Origen’s “On First Principles”, proposed in foreign studies, is discussed. Based on the above data, important shortcomings of this theory are shown.
Keywords: Origen, On First Principles, Latin manuscript tradition, structural interpretation, table of contents.
References:
Show less
Show more
1. Dorival G. (1975) Remarques sur la forme du Peri Archon [Notes on the shape of the Peri Archon]. In: Origeniana. Premier colloque international des études origéniennes [Originiana. First international colloquium of Origenian studies]. Bari, pp. 33–45. (in French).
2. Fernandez S. (2016) Division and Structure of De Principiis. In: Origeniana Undecima: Origen and Origenism in the History of Western Thought. Leuven, pp. 323–336. (in English).
3. Harl M. (1961) Recherches sur le Περὶ Άρχῶν d’Origene en vue d’une nouvelle edition: La division en chapitres [Research on the Περὶ Άρχῶν of Origen in view of a new edition: The division into chapters]. In: Studia Patristica: Papers Presented to the Third International Conference on Patristic Studies Held at Christ Church. Vol. III/1: Introductio, Editiones, Critica, Philologica. Berlin, pp. 57–67. (in French).
4. Harl M. (1975) Structure et coherence du Peri Archon [Structure and coherence of the Peri Archon]. In: Origeniana. Premier colloque international des études origéniennes [Originiana. First international colloquium of Origenian studies]. Bari, pp. 11–32. (in French).
5. Kannengiesser Ch. (1992) Origen, Systematician in De Principiis. In: Daly R.J. Origeniana Quinta: Historica, Text and Method, Biblica, Philosophica, Theologica, Origenism and Later Developments. Leuven, pp. 395–405. (in English).
6. Maksimov S.A. (2023) "Oglavleniye traktata Origena «O nachalakh» kak material dlya izucheniya peredachi latinskikh titulov proizvedeniya" [Table of contents of Origen's treatise "On the Beginnings" as a material for studying the transmission of Latin titles of the work]. In: "Vestnik Orenburgskoy Dukhovnoy Seminarii" [Bulletin of the Orenburg Theological Seminary]. No. 3 (28). (in Russian).
7. Maksimov S.A. (2023) "Osnovnyye nedostatki stemmy rukopisey, predlozhennoy v sovremennykh kriticheskikh izdaniyakh traktata Origena «O nachalakh»" [The main shortcomings of the manuscript stemma proposed in modern critical editions of Origen's treatise "On the Beginnings"]. In: "Vestnik Omskoy Pravoslavnoy Dukhovnoy Seminarii" [Bulletin of the Omsk OrthodoX Theological Seminary]. No. 1 (14). pp. 11–31. (in Russian).
8. Mikhailov P.B. (2012) "Bogoslovskiye strategii v traktate Origena «O nachalakh»" [Theological Strategies in Origen's Treatise "On the Beginnings"]. In: "Polemicheskaya kul'tura i struktura nauchnogo teksta v Sredniye veka i ranneye Novoye vremya" [Polemic Culture and the Structure of the Scientific Text in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times]. Moscow, pp. 17–26. (in Russian).
9. Rubtsov D.A. (2020) "Traktat Origena «O nachalakh»: obzor strukturnykh interpretatsiy v nauchnykh izdaniyakh traktata za proshedshiye 100 let" [Origen's treatise "On the Beginnings": a review of structural interpretations in scientific editions of the treatise over the past 100 years]. In: "Vestnik Yekaterinburgskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Bulletin of the Ekaterinburg Theological Seminary]. No. 4 (32). pp. 29–47. (in Russian).
10. Seregin A.V. (2015) "Traktat Origena «O nachalakh»" [Origen's Treatise "On the Beginnings"]. In: "Filosofskiy zhurnal" [Philosophical Journal]. Vol. 8. No. 2. pp. 44–55. (in Russian).
11. Simonetti M. (1962) Osservazioni sulla struttura del De principiis di Origene [Observations on the structure De principiis of Origen]. In: Rivista di Filologia e d’Istruzione Classica [Journal of Philology and Classical Education]. 40, pp. 273–290; 372–393. (in Italian).
Author information:
Sergey Maksimov;
graduate of postgraduate studies, Moscow Theological Academy;
Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra, Sergiev Posad, 141300, Russian Federation
Publications
Archpriest Kirill Krasnoshchekov
Saratov church intelligentsia during the years of persecution: Materials for the biography of A.A. Solovyov
For citation:
Krasnoshchekov K., archpriest. Saratovskaya tserkovnaya intelligentsiya v gody goneniy. Materialy k biografii A.A. Solov'yeva [Saratov church intelligentsia during the years of persecution: Materials for the biography of A.A. Solovyov] // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2023. No 3 (22). pp. 111–124. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2023_22_111
Abstract: The article collects and systematizes biographical materials about the life of the most prominent representative of the Saratov church intelligentsia in 1920–1930, Alexander Aleksandrovich Solovyov, who played an important role in upholding OrthodoXy in Saratov. A. A. Solovyov, a lawyer by education, as a very young man led the lay resistance to the Renovationist turmoil of 1922. During the most difficult years for the Church in 1922–23, at the age of 25 he was one of the leaders of the Saratov church life, thanks to him the renovationists in the Saratov diocese achieved almost nothing. In the 1930s, during the campaign to close churches, the rectors and members of the parish councils of the churches of Saratov turned to Alexander Alexandrovich for legal assistance. Understanding perfectly well the danger to which he exposed himself, Alexander Alexandrovich again entered the struggle for the Church. For the first time, the article introduces into scientific circulation the materials of two archival and investigative cases from the Archive of the Federal Security Service of the Saratov Region.
Keywords: Alexander Alexandrovich Solovyov, persecution of the Russian OrthodoX Church, Renovationist schism, closure of churches in the 1930s, repressions.
References:
Author information:
Archpriest Kirill Krasnoshchekov;
Candidate of Theology, Associate Professor;Head of the Department of Church History;
Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary;
92 Michurina str., Saratov, 410028, Russian Federation;
Email:
o.kirill@list.ruORCID: 0000-0002-7046-7592
Read full text (in Russian) (pdf)
Book Reviews
Mikhail Kovshov
The Epistle to the Hebrews "Verse by Verse": on a new commentary on the most Old Testament letter of the Holy Apostle Paul
Book Reviews: Osborne G.R., Guthrie G.H. Hebrews: Verse by Verse / Osborne New Testament Commen- taries. Bellingham (WА): Lexham Press, 2021. 360 р.
For citation:
Kovshov M. Poslaniye k Yevreyam «stikh za stikhom»: o novom kommentarii k samomu vetkhozavetnomu pis'mu svyatogo apostola Pavla [The Epistle to the Hebrews "Verse by Verse": on a new commentary on the most Old Testament letter of the Holy Apostle Paul]. Book review: Osborne G.R., Guthrie G.H. Hebrews: Verse by Verse / Osborne New Testament Commen- taries. Bellingham (WА): Lexham Press, 2021. 360 р. // Trudy Saratovskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi seminarii. [Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2023. No 3 (22). pp. 125–135. DOI: 10.56621/27825884_2023_22_125
References:
Show less
Show more
1. Brown R. (2007) "Vvedeniye v Novyy Zavet" [Introduction to the New Testament]. Vol. 2. Moscow. (in Russian).
2. Dobykin D.G. (2016) "Pravoslavnoye ucheniye o tolkovanii Svyashchennogo Pisaniya: lektsii po bibleyskoy germenevtike" [OrthodoX Teaching on the Interpretation of Holy Scripture: Lectures on Biblical Hermeneutics]. Saint Petersburg. (in Russian).
3. Glubokovsky N.N. (1937) "Poslaniye k Yevreyam i istoricheskoye predaniye o nem" [The Epistle to the Hebrews and Historical Tradition about It]. In: "Godishnik na Sofiyskiy universitet" [Yearbook for Sofia University]. Book 14. 1936–1937. Available at: http:// bible-spbda.ru/e-books/ee-books/glubokovskiy_n.n.-poslanie_k_ evreyam_i_istoricheskoe_predanie_o_nem.pdf (08/05/2023). Sofia. (in Russian).
4. Gorbunov S.N. (2011) "K voprosu o teoreticheskom obosnovanii metodov filologicheskogo analiza poslaniya k Yevreyam" [On the issue of theoretical substantiation of the methods of philological analysis of the Epistle to the Hebrews]. In: "Trudy Nizhegorodskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Proceedings of the Nizhny Novgorod Theological Seminary]. No. 9. pp. 143–155. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/ elibrary_30458494_19416329.pdf (05/08/2023). (in Russian).
5. Gorbunov S.N. (2012) "Problema atributsii Poslaniya k Yevreyam: kriticheskiy analiz mneniya Origena i vnutrennego svidetel'stva teksta (Yevr. 2:3)" [The problem of attribution of the Epistle to the Hebrews: a critical analysis of Origen's opinion and the internal evidence of the text (Heb. 2:3)]. In: "Trudy Nizhegorodskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Proceedings of the Nizhny Novgorod Theological Seminary]. No. 10. pp. 37–61. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/ elibrary_30463642_98343484.pdf (05/08/2023). (in Russian).
6. Gorbunov S.N. (2019) "Problema atributsii poslaniya k Yevreyam v epokhu Reformatsii" [The problem of attribution of the Epistle to the Hebrews in the era of the Reformation]. In: "Pravoslavnaya tserkovnaya nauka: traditsii, novatsii, aktual'nyye konteksty: sbornik statey po materialam yezhegodnoy nauchno-bogoslovskoy konferentsii (16 maya 2019 goda)" [OrthodoX Church Science: traditions, innovations, current contexts: a collection of articles based on the materials of the annual scientific and theological conference (May 16, 2019)]. Issue I. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_37540786_12600686. pdf (05/08/2023). (in Russian).
7. Gorbunov S.N. (2021) "Ob ob"yektivnosti sravnitel'no-statisticheskogo analiza unikal'nykh slov: na primere leksiki Poslaniya k Yevreyam" [On the objectivity of the comparative statistical analysis of unique words: on the example of the vocabulary of the Epistle to the Hebrews]. In: "Voprosy bogosloviya" [Questions of Theology]. No. 2(6). pp. 41–51. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_50443886_41991860. pdf (05/08/2023). (in Russian).
8. Kazinov V.A. (2019) "K voprosu ob ispol'zovanii apostolom Pavlom sekretarskoy pomoshchi pri napisanii poslaniy" [On the question of the use of secretarial assistance by the Apostle Paul when writing epistles]. In: "Trudy Kolomenskoy dukhovnoy seminarii" [Proceedings of the Kolomna Theological Seminary]. No. 13. pp. 76–97. (in Russian).
9. Kazinov V.A. (2020) "K voprosu ob atributsii poslaniy apostola Pavla v sovremennoy bibleistike: formirovaniye Korpusa Paulinum v kontekste praktiki psevdonimii Antichnogo Mira" [On the question of the attribution of the epistles of the Apostle Paul in modern biblical studies: the formation of the Paulinum Corpus in the context of the practice of pseudonymy of the Ancient World]. In: "Aktual'nyye voprosy tserkovnoy nauki" [Actual questions of church science]. No. 2. pp. 101–112. (in Russian).
10. Kovshov M.V. "Chto na samom dele napisal apostol Pavel? «Devtero- pauliny» i ikh mesto v kanone Novogo Zaveta" [What did the apostle Paul actually write? "Deutero-Paulins" and their place in the canon of the New Testament]. Available at: https://stavroskrest.ru/sites/ default/files/files/pdf/chto-na-samom-dele-napisal-apostol-pavel.pdf (05/08/2023). (in Russian).
11. Men A. (2002) "Bibliologicheskiy slovar': V 3 t. T. 2: K–P" [Bibliological Dictionary: In 3 vols. Vol. 2: K–P]. Moscow. (in Russian).
12. Osborne G.R. (2009) "Germenevticheskaya spiral': obshcheye vvedeniye v bibleyskoye tolkovaniye" [The Hermeneutic Spiral: A General Introduction to Biblical Interpretation]. Odessa. (in Russian).
13. Osborne G.R., Guthrie G.H. (2021) Hebrews: Verse by Verse. Bellingham. (in English).
14. Yurevich D. (2016) "Vvedeniye v Novyy Zavet" [Introduction to the New Testament]. Saint Petersburg. (in Russian).
Author information:
Mikhail Kovshov;
Candidate of Theology, Associate Professor;
Associate Professor, Department of Biblical Studies;
Moscow Theological Academy;
Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra, Sergiev Posad, 141300, Russian Federation;
Perervinskaya Orthodox Theological Seminary;
82 Highway str., Moscow, 109383, Russian Federation
ORCID: 0000-0003-0656-1135
